Paromita Das
New Delhi: The Waqf Amendment Bill (2025) has become a topic of intense debate across Bharat, sparking discussions on legal, religious, and political fronts. As one of the most significant reforms proposed in recent times concerning waqf properties, the bill has drawn both support and opposition from various stakeholders. While the government asserts that the bill is aimed at bringing transparency and efficiency in managing waqf properties, many Muslim organizations and opposition parties fear it is a step towards government overreach into religious institutions.
The bill’s provisions suggest substantial changes in the governance of waqf properties, especially in terms of who holds authority over them and how they are documented. Union Home Minister Amit Shah, in a recent interview, clarified that the bill is intended for the future rather than addressing immediate concerns. This statement has added another dimension to the ongoing controversy, raising questions about what the government’s long-term vision is for waqf lands and institutions.
Understanding Waqf and Its Importance in Bharat
The concept of waqf originates from Islamic law, where individuals dedicate property for charitable, religious, or community welfare purposes. Once declared as waqf, the property becomes inalienable, meaning it cannot be sold, transferred, or inherited. Instead, it is administered by waqf boards or trustees, ensuring that its benefits reach the intended beneficiaries.
In Bharat, waqf properties cover an estimated 900,000 acres of land, making waqf boards the third-largest landowners after the Indian Railways and the Ministry of Defence. These properties include mosques, dargahs, educational institutions, orphanages, graveyards, and commercial properties whose revenues support religious and charitable activities. The administration of waqf properties has often been plagued by corruption, mismanagement, and disputes over ownership, leading to demands for greater transparency.
Key Provisions of the Waqf Amendment Bill (2025)
The proposed Waqf Amendment Bill (2025) brings several fundamental changes to the existing legal framework governing waqf properties. One of the most debated provisions is the shift in authority from Waqf Tribunals to District Collectors, giving the latter the power to decide whether a property is waqf or government land. This change aims to streamline dispute resolution but has raised concerns about potential political and administrative interference.
Another crucial aspect of the bill is the requirement for proper legal documentation of waqf properties. Until now, many properties have been registered through oral declarations, leading to ambiguities and disputes. The amendment mandates that only properties backed by a waqfnama, a legally recognized document, can be classified as waqf land. While this move could help in preventing unauthorized claims, critics argue that it could also be used to invalidate waqf properties that lack written documentation, even if they have been used as such for centuries.
The bill also proposes the creation of separate waqf boards for different Muslim sects, such as Bohras and Aghakhanis, to ensure better representation and management of their respective properties. Additionally, it mandates that at least two Muslim women must be included in every state waqf board and the Central Waqf Council, a step that aims to promote inclusivity and gender representation in waqf management.
Government’s Justification and Amit Shah’s Clarification
The BJP-led central government has defended the bill, stating that it is not aimed at taking over waqf properties but rather at ensuring better governance, transparency, and efficiency. The government argues that a more structured approach is necessary to prevent corruption, encroachments, and disputes, which have long plagued the waqf system in Bharat.
Union Home Minister Amit Shah recently addressed concerns about the bill, stating that it is meant for the future, not the present. His statement suggests that the government is planning for long-term reforms in waqf administration rather than tackling any immediate crisis. However, this explanation has not been enough to pacify critics, who question the timing and necessity of the bill.
Opposition and Allegations Against the Bill
The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) and other Muslim organizations have strongly opposed the bill, claiming that it is a covert attempt to seize waqf properties. The AIMPLB’s spokesperson, S.Q.R. Ilyas, has alleged that all 44 amendments in the bill are designed to manipulate and undermine the status of waqf properties.
Another significant concern is the transfer of decision-making power to District Collectors, who are government-appointed officials. Critics argue that this move could lead to political interference in waqf matters, potentially resulting in the reclassification of waqf properties as government land. They fear that this could weaken the autonomy of waqf institutions and deprive the Muslim community of valuable assets meant for religious and social welfare.
Many legal experts and opposition parties have also questioned the timing of the bill, which comes ahead of key state elections. They argue that the government might be using this issue to consolidate its voter base and divert attention from other pressing economic and social concerns.
Implications of the Bill: What Lies Ahead?
If the Waqf Amendment Bill (2025) is passed, it will bring major changes to how waqf properties are managed in Bharat. On one hand, the bill could help in preventing encroachments, ensuring better documentation, and improving overall governance. However, on the other hand, it could also lead to bureaucratic overreach, legal battles, and heightened tensions between the government and the Muslim community.
One of the biggest concerns is the potential for legal challenges. If the bill becomes law, it is likely to be challenged in courts by waqf boards and religious organizations. Prolonged litigation could further complicate property disputes rather than resolving them.
The bill also raises questions about religious autonomy. By shifting decision-making powers from Waqf Tribunals to district authorities, it changes the fundamental structure of waqf management. This could set a precedent for greater government control over religious properties, not just for Muslims but also for other religious communities in the future.
Striking a Balance Between Reform and Rights
While reforming waqf administration is necessary, it must be done in consultation with all stakeholders. The government should ensure that the amendments do not disempower waqf boards or lead to involuntary reclassification of properties. A more balanced approach, involving Muslim organizations, legal experts, and community leaders, is essential to create a framework that is both efficient and fair.
Additionally, transparency should be a two-way process. If the government demands proper documentation from waqf institutions, it should also guarantee legal protections against unfair acquisition or encroachment of waqf lands. Without such safeguards, the bill could be seen as a targeted measure rather than a genuine reform.
The Waqf Amendment Bill (2025) has ignited controversy due to its far-reaching implications on religious properties, governance, and legal frameworks. While the government claims it is a step toward modernizing waqf management, critics argue that it could weaken religious autonomy and pave the way for property seizures.
The bill’s future impact will depend on how it is implemented and whether the government is willing to address the concerns of the Muslim community. Striking a balance between reform and rights will be crucial to ensuring that waqf properties continue to serve their intended purpose without undue interference or mismanagement.
The post Waqf Board Under Fire: A 70-Year-Old Institution in Crisis appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates.
